Really wish the Mac Studio Ultra didn’t jump from 96GB all the way to 256GB. It’s a huge price jump for that capacity change. While 96GB is plenty for now, it feels like it could become tight over the next few years with AI taking off. At the same time, 256GB is way more than I’d need for this iteration.

Would be great to have an option of one of 128/160/192GB along the way, or, you know, slotted and upgradeable memory.

Would love to see a new Mac Studio sooner than expected. However, I really hope the rumors of the CPU choices being either the M4 Max or M3 Ultra are shown to be false.

I would happily spring for an Ultra model, which is really the biggest benefit of buying a Studio over a MacBook Pro with the same Max chip in it. Picking more CPU cores over a newer architecture wouldn’t be an easy choice though, even for something as massively parallel as compiling code.

Here’s a size comparison of the RF lens vs the EF with adapter. It’s going to take me awhile to get used to the lens being all the way retracted at 24mm and lengthening at 14 and 35mm. Camera balance is worlds better though.

Took advantage of a Black Friday sale and upgraded from the EF 16-35mm f4L to this RF 14-35mm f4L. Really looking forward to not needing an adapter to use an ultrawide again–it totally threw off the balance of the camera while using it on an RF body. Not to mention this’ll be about a half pound lighter when traveling.

Was hoping to get it cheaper with Canon’s usual refurbished sale, but it turned out the sale price on a new lens was only $50 more so I went for that instead.

It’s that time of year again. We haven’t gotten snow yet, but it’s been dropping below the 45° cutoff of my summer tires for the last couple weeks.

@paul@tapbots.social I picked up a Unifi rack mount PDU awhile back and love it. Reasonably priced compared to other metered PDUs and a heck of a lot nicer to use.

Just learned that Swift’s Duration measures time down to an attosecond (1×10^-18 of a second).

There’s forward thinking, and then there’s attosecond forward thinking. According to Wikipedia, an attosecond is to a second as a second is to about 31 billion years.

I suppose this gives the option of Duration being used in scientific computing, but it’ll be a long time before attoseconds would make sense to measure an interval in coding.